Showing posts with label frame. Show all posts
Showing posts with label frame. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Shadow spirit.

I was confronted by my shadow in the street.

I studied it.

I eyed it through the lens.

Its presence filled, then overwhelmed the viewfinder.

It loomed over me, demanding attention.

The camera captured no more than a lie.

I play with the image.

I find myself annotating the intangible.

A shadow spirit walks the street still.

It has broken its bounds.

Cost per click.

I clicked on the small tab at the top right of the ad.

I opened a menu.

I found:

"Why am I seeing this?" 

I wasn't really seeing "this" at all.

I clicked out of curiosity.

I was met with:


I find "myself" "interested in luxury goods".

"Manage your advert preferences"

"Take control over the adverts you see."

I am amused at the idea of "taking control."

I find a red heart, (my heart gushes) and words: 

"Your interests"

My interests? I think not.

Grid after grid of "interests".

Audi France wants to reach men aged 35 to 55.

Fuck them.


Nowhere do I find mentioned: light, shadow, wind, rain, storms, dusk, clouds.

I make screenshots, a gif, a collage and tweet.

Fuck them.

They know "everything" about "me", they know nothing.

Storm warning.

It was the sound of the wind in the tree which stopped me in my tracks.

Its branches were swaying wildly, casting shadow.

We stood there witness, I, ears to the fir.

It shrieked dumbly a storm warning.

I took my time to take note.

I took my time to listen, to look, to feel, to breathe, to remark the backgrounded noise of the city.

An ambulance siren speeds past. 

A drama, an accident, a death?

I know not.

No matter.

No story. 

No body.

An ambulance siren speeds past.

A wind blows, the tree sways...

I cling on to it, as a sailor to a mast of a boat, tossed on an ocean.

A wind blows, the tree sways...

The pages of a blog written by Mary Ann Reilly.
Words capture no more than a lie.

Therein lies our truth.

Shadow Spirit

I find myself annotating the intangible.

I play with words.

A shadow spirit walks the street still.

It has broken its bounds.

“In any case life is but a procession of shadows, and God knows why it is that we embrace them so eagerly, and see them depart with such anguish, being shadows.”
Virginia Woolf,
Jacob's Room

 

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Rex T.

T Rex.

Tyrannosaurus Rex.

Meaning: Tyrant Lizard King.

(Species extinct)

My father refused to believe in dinosaurs.

They were not mentioned in Genesis.

They didn't feature in Eden.


"The skeletons in museums must be fake," 
he concluded.

I found it terribly hard to understand how anybody remotely curious could conclude that dinosaurs were part of a giant conspiracy theory.

This was a leap of faith too far for me.

Rex T.

I am coming to the conclusion that dinosaurs are far from extinct.

Recent political events suggest that they have been simply dormant or hiding.

Big beasts are ready to wreak havoc across the savanah.

Peace is over.

“Man is the most vicious of all animals, and life is a series of battles ending in victory or defeat.”

D. Tyrannosaurus

Well, we are in for a hell of a battle.

I hear people who pride themselves on being "killers" (D. Tyronnosaurus)

Their go to emotion is rage.

They pray for prey to ravage.

“According to Barbara Res, who in the early 1980s served as vice president in charge of construction of Tyrannosaur Tower in Manhattan, the emotional core around which D. Tyrannosaur’s personality constellates is anger: “As far as the anger is concerned, that’s real for sure. He’s not faking it,” she told The Daily Beast in February.  “The fact that he gets mad, that’s his personality.” Indeed, anger may be the operative emotion behind Tyrannosaur’s high extroversion as well as his low agreeableness. Anger can fuel malice, but it can also motivate social dominance, stoking a desire to win the adoration of others.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/

We appear to be in a period of regression.

There are those who would be king...

"Celebrities and rich people “all come over” to Mar-a-Lago, Tyrannosaur’s exclusive Palm Beach estate. “They all eat, they all love me, they all kiss my ass. And then they all leave and say, ‘Isn’t he horrible.’ But I’m the king.”

There are those who dream of triumph.

We have fantasies of all conquering national power.

Can't we get over that affliction?

Apparently not.

"Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Albert Einstein

We have flag wavers all over the place.

Can't folks be satisfied with being just another human?

Apparently not.

What is the point of one guy winning if we all lose?

Dunno.

Conspiracy theories

Emotion trumps rational thought.

The elite are reptiles.

How the hell do we explain how people are so fucking stupid to believe this crap?

How on earth did my father manage to believe that dinosaurs didn't exist?

How can some people be prolife and simultaneously prodeath?

Dunno.

I fell upon a conference of George Lakoff in attempt to understand.



That helped a bit.

There are people with different codes of morality.

That helped me figure this out a bit.

“Morality of Reward and Punishment plays an enormous role in the conservative worldview. The reward side rules out any government distribution of wealth or benefits that is not based on free market competition, and it makes the right to the disposition of private property absolute; the punishment side focuses the criminal justice system on retribution.”

George Lakoff, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Third Edition


Rex T.

How do we stop these fucking dinosaurs from wrecking the planet?

How do we get beyond metaphors of "competition" for education?

“Competition therefore is moral; it is a condition for the development and sustenance of the right kind of person. Correspondingly, constraints on competition are immoral; they inhibit the development and sustenance of the right kind of person. Even” 

― George LakoffMoral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think,


How do we stop people getting themselves killed for imagined 'countries'?

How is it that people haven't figured that these crack-pot dinosaurs depend on us for their existence?

Are we still at this level of evolution:


“Men are Moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.”


How is it that people haven't figured out yet that there is a limit to the planet's resources and that we need to learn how to live peacefully together?

“Everything begins with a strong military. Everything.” D. Tyrannosaurus.

What is this fucking vision of "Great"?



What is the ultimate prize? Infamy?

"When somebody challenges you, fight back. Be brutal, be tough." D. Tyrannosaurus

Beat Russia?
Beat China?
Beat Europe?
Kill the natives?
Achieve the final solution?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/02/steve-bannon-donald-trump-war-south-china-sea-no-doubt





"We're going to war with China, there's no doubt about that." S. Bannon.

For some people America was great in the fifites...





"Dr. Strangelove: I would not rule out the chance to preserve a nucleus of human specimens. It would be quite easy...heh, heh...at the bottom of ah...some of our deeper mineshafts. Radioactivity would never penetrate a mine some thousands of feet deep, and in a matter of weeks, sufficient improvements in drilling space could easily be provided.
Muffley: How long would you have to stay down there?
Dr. Strangelove: ...I would think that uh, possibly uh...one hundred years...It would not be difficult Mein Fuehrer! Nuclear reactors could, heh...I'm sorry, Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plant life. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country, but I would guess that dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided.
Muffley: Well, I, I would hate to have to decide...who stays up and...who goes down.
Dr. Strangelove: Well, that would not be necessary, Mr. President. It could easily be accomplished with a computer. And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of necessary skills. Of course, it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition. Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. Ha, ha. But ah, with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present Gross National Product within say, twenty years.
Muffley: Wouldn't this nucleus of survivors be so grief-stricken and anguished that they'd, well, envy the dead and not want to go on living?
Dr. Strangelove: When they go down into the mine, everyone would still be alive. There would be no shocking memories, and the prevailing emotion will be one of nostalgia for those left behind, combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead! [involuntarily gives the Nazi salute and forces it down with his other hand]Ahhh!
Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?
Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious...service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.
Russian Ambassador: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor."


Does distinction come from extinction?

Nope.

Sorry D. Tyrannosaurus Rex.

You think you are a big tough guy.

You're an irritating speck in a blink of history.

“Of the four billion life forms which have existed on this planet, three billion, nine hundred and sixty million are now extinct. We don't know why. Some by wanton extinction, some through natural catastrophe, some destroyed by meteorites and asteroids. In the light of these mass extinctions it really does seem unreasonable to suppose that Homo sapiens should be exempt. Our species will have been one of the shortest-lived of all, a mere blink, you may say, in the eye of time.” 

― P.D. JamesThe Children of Men



Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Land ranging and roving.

There is a book on my shelf.

It is waiting for me to take the time which it deserves.

"Landscape and Memory." 
Simon Schama

We have become illiterate to the land.


How much have we written on its surface?

I look at the map.

Map

A diagrammatic representation of an area of land or sea showing physical features, cities, roads, etc.a street map
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
  • The discovery of the city wall remains was not a surprise to the City Council as maps had pinpointed Peter Street as a location for the historic ruins.
  • You have to identify a street with a name, using a map or a road sign.
  • There have been no measures initiated nor a road map charted out, to rectify such fiscal imbalances and to restore balance for long term growth.

A river arcs across the grid.

It continues beyond the fold.

How will I gauage its flow?

I put my licked finger to the wind and wander North.

I come to a fence and a sign.

The threats stop me in my tracks.



Ranger

A keeper of a park, forest, or area of countryside:park rangers
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
  • That was not a secret in the city, and the police and park rangers turned a blind eye.
  • Most students were restless while the park ranger explained about the animals in the area.
  • During the trip, one of the kids is bitten by a snake and their guide, the park ranger, heads back to base for a serum.

I turn around the barbed forest, looking for open ground.


Rover




A person who spends their time wandering:they became rovers who departed further and further from civilization
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
  • I could take on a crew and sail to Canada in my own boat instead of booking passage, or turn into a rover of the sea, going where I please and doing what I like.
  • But who is he, this invisible being that rules me, this unknowable being, this rover of a supernatural race?

Book




A written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers:a book of selected poems
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
  • After some serious research he wrote a book on the subject, Ancient Mosaics in Bulgaria.
  • Rosie bought me the DVD along with a book on philosophy.
  • I sat there a while longer, staring down at the vellum pages of the book on the low desk before me.

Memory




The faculty by which the mind stores and remembers information:I’ve a great memory for faces[MASS NOUN]: the brain regions responsible for memory
MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
  • No problem there, I have a terrible memory for names so didn't even remember them five seconds after leaving the room.
  • She still has a great memory for all the old Irish songs and poems.
  • All creatures do need a memory for basic functioning and survival.


Wide ranging questions.


The more maps we need the more we lose/have lost our (emotional/physical) attachment to the land?

What is close reading if we are detached?

Is writing to be detached?

Apparent detachment brings paradoxical attachment.

Is it to be "out of body" or is it to be "embodied"?

I know knot what I write.
(He keeps the typing error k)

Roving

I am roving across the page. I pause an instant.

There are decisions here which are hardly conscious.

I reach out for a defintion.

One definition calls over another.

A song.

I am conscious of the space.

I pause an instant.

I remember.

I pick up the memory of a man who has lost his.

I place it there.

I scroll up.

I retrace my steps.

How much of my memory is dependent on what others have forgotten?

Where was I now?

I had Googled Domesday Book.



We are surrounded by cartographers, rangers and accountants.

We are much endebted.

References.

Blommaert, J., 2010, Historical Bodies and Historical Space.

Schama, S., 1996,  Landscape and Memory

Wesch, M., 2014, Why we need a why.








Wednesday, January 27, 2016

My lawyer is a dog.


"Wuf, wuf, snarl"

I am, against my better judgement participating in conversation with people talking about...
(who is this better and why is he/she speaking to me?) 

 INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN.

"wuf, wuf, snarl...huh?"

I felt it wasn't for me.

I never read instruction manuals (until it is too late).

I once worked with people who called themselves  'Ingénieur Pédagogique'
(instructional designers).

I was impressed.

I am just a teacher.

I asked annoying questions about LMS's.

I obviously didn't understand.

Serious Business.

In France if you are the business you are an engineer of something.

I blame Napoleon bloody Bonaparte, that great liberal thinker.

I looked at the invitation to participate in #MOOCMOOC it included the words:

INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN.

I had nightmares of Skinner and bloody CD roms.

"It's a nice day today, isn't it? [REPEAT] It's a nice day today isn't it?"


 

"Oh gawd!" I thought.

I didn't feel that it would be for me.

INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN

I have been conned into participating.

It happened on Twitter.

I fell into a dialogue with PEOPLE.


They have my attention now...at least for now...



I now have a bloody Storify to work on from last night and then blog about.

There aren't even any deadlines or badges.

Shit!

What am I letting myself in for?

Shit!

Coffee break.



So I sat down for coffee with a bunch of playmobil and a few students.

We started talking about their research questions.

With about two hundred students to help get up and curious, I need coffee and a comfortable chair.

Banter scaffold.

Some are immediately curious and are looking for a sounding board for their ideas.

(It was pretty much like the conversations that I am still working on for #moocbloodymooc.)

We engage in a bit of banter - throwing ideas, pictures, and sounds off of each other.

They go off with enthusiasm...(like me here.)

Banksy approach to education.

I was delighted to be learning in the company of some of my fellow co-learners (students) this morning.

With one, we started talking about Street Art and its influence on political debate.

We framed and reframed the debate...together.

Is Street Art still Street Art when it is shared as a photo on Twitter?

Is it Street Art when Deborah De Robertis 'exposes' herself in the Musée Orsay? 

Is her performance art pornography?

Why is Manet's painting of Olympia not pornography?




What is the relationship between viral images like 'Je suis Charlie' and the 'traditional media' and the politicians and mass demonstrations in Paris?




I wasn't expecting to be co-framing such a debate with one of the students from Sport Science...over coffee.

Coffee tables, and comfortable chairs restructure relationships.

I never know what I will learn.

That is the joy of what I do, it is never predictable, I have to jump from Drugs in Sport, to Perfect Pitch in musicians, to Sport Fishing, to mushroom hunting.

I feel energised by our dialogues.

Other students have much more difficulty to ask questions.

They seem to have little practise in asking questions, most of their time is taken up by content.

Changing symbols...playing with people.

We sat around the coffee table and a bunch of Playmobil.

We started playing with the little people, the dog, the cow, the house, the boat, the medical bag.


Manipulating the toys seemed to help them to disassemble the tortured sentences that they had been trying and failing to write.

Were we talking about all the people, the kids, the women, the doctor, the policeman?

Were we talking about all the world, a town, a village, a house, an organism?

Do I have to speak dog?

Confronted by the request to define a research question, one student was freaking out and came up to me to ask:

"Est ce qu'il faut que la question soit poussée?" "Does the question have to be sophisticated?"

What he meant was:  does the question have to use that language that the experts I don't understand in class use.

We sometimes forget that others don't understand us
We sometimes forget that others are not all as enthusiastic as us.
We sometimes forget that others don't have the same literacies as us.

Being literate...being illiterate.

Playing Minecraft with my son made me realise how our joystick/gaming literacies are so far apart.

We are playing the games of others...

Working with high-performance athletes makes me realise how amazing their physical literacies are...

Moving around a dense text (network) requires the ability to connect, engage, orientate, select, synthesise...

It is not quite the same as pole-vaulting.

There is not quite the same exhiliration...for them.

Maybe we are blind to our/their literacies?

We could imagine 'scaffolding' which might be more or less adaptive to the individual learner.

(often text based or computer based - no good for people who are allergic to text.)

Liberté pour tous?

We could imagine 'scaffolding' which is deliberately opaque to certain groups of learners so that they are excluded from a knowledge community.

Language is clearly a hell of a great way to include and/or exclude people.

"Quoi?"

Language is clearly a hell of a great innovation to enable sophistication of connections between people(s) and their environments.

Cultural/narrative environments...(networks) are clearly more or less apparent to us.

After all, I'm a fish what the hell is water?

Fish interlude.


Scaffolding may be deliberately, or unconsciously conceived to protect certain groups' privileges.

(The LMS anybody?)

I AM AN ADMIN. 
(I am ingénieur pédagogique)

Dog speak.

My lawyer is a dog.

He is deliberately bred to obscure contractual relationships, for the benefit of the privileged.

When I read the small print on terms and conditions of internet services...

I can't be bothered to work through every clause...

Is this web freedom?

I submit. 

We go for a walk.

Dog translation

There are others who are prepared to translate dog into English.

But God, those guys are necessary.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jun/15/i-read-all-the-small-print-on-the-internet

Our relationships have become so complex...(complicated?) ...we need experts.(we do don't we?)

They can give us a cheat code to get to the next level...
(for a small sum)

I suppose this is what we try to do in education.

We unpick dog.

We teach dog.

HOLY DOG!!

Science, technology and text literacy are holy untouchable.

OUR HOLY BOOK (s).





I understand much more now one of Dave Cormier's provocation:

"Books are just stupid people."

KILL THE DOG

There is a question which keeps dogging me.

Are we so used to unpicking dog that we kill the dog?

Is our frame of reference, our Western culture: this frame we have had since the Lumières... killing us?

LIBERTE

Are our frames of reference the only way to live the world?

Are our frames of reference killing the world?

We frame so we are human.



We encourage agency of the individual. We live by freedom-Freire. Does that kill (a) people?




In encouraging agency of the individual do we lose sight of how we are connected in this tapestry we ourselves have woven?

Our tapestries are so beautifully diverse....yet.

Are we missing this essence beyond our words, beyond our ken?





"wuf, wuf, snarl..."

My dog is trying to tell me something...






















Thursday, October 29, 2015

Auto-dissect.



Fragments of life: be framed and labelled;

Our being remains to be mined, 

To be showcased, ranked and B graded.

Ante-mortem our auto-dissection CV:

See skeleton remains, but all b. essence is lost.